Russia’s Ukraine Invasion–The Cost

By Jay Holmes

Precisely who is fighting in Ukraine depends upon whom you ask. When Russian Dictator Vladimir Putin speaks to non-Russians, he claims the Russian-speaking Ukrainian rebels are valiantly fighting to save Russian-speaking orphans, Jews, and senior citizens from the vicious onslaught of the Ukrainian government. When Putin speaks at home, he says the Jews are plotting with Americans to overthrow Ukraine. The Ukrainian government, along with most of the rest of the planet, takes a different view. According to Kiev, the violence in eastern Ukraine is instigated by, funded by, and in part fought by Russian security forces.



Base image for Putin meme  from Agencia Brasil, wikimedia commons.

Base image for Putin meme
from Agencia Brasil, wikimedia commons.


From Putin’s office in Moscow, the Russian invasion must seem like a great idea. His entire campaign platform—for the next campaign, last campaign, or any campaign—is his vision of returning Russia to the former glory that, in his view, it enjoyed during the Soviet era. Many Russians don’t have the same memory of enjoying that glory, or much of anything else during that time. Unfortunately, their memories and opinions no longer count for much since Putin has consolidated his power as a New Age Stalin.

A year ago, NATO-aligned nations warned Putin that the costs to Russia for invading Ukraine would far outweigh any nationalist glory that he might obtain.

In response, Putin confidently explained to Western journalists that Europe would suffer more than Russia would from any Western-imposed economic sanctions. At that time and to this day, Putin is denying that any such invasion has taken place, or that the economic sanctions are hurting Russia. They are.

Since the invasion of Ukraine, Russia’s currency and its stock market have plummeted, and energy prices have dropped like a rock. Between that and the damaging economic sanctions that Putin had so confidently laughed off, the economic outlook for Russia is much less favorable today than it was a year ago.

Given Putin’s plans for increased military spending, the Russian taxpayers can expect decreased standards of living, accompanied by decreased civil rights.

The Russian people are already experiencing a decline in the standard of living in economic terms. Along with this, Putin is intolerant of dissent, the state controls the media, and political opponents are being jailed. Apparently, Putin’s visions of former Soviet glory come down to more centralized authority, fewer human rights, and the same economic hopelessness that made life so miserable in the old regime. Welcome to the “good old days.”


Euro to Russian Ruble Exchange Rate Image by Gorgo, wikimedia commons.

Euro to Russian Ruble Exchange Rate
Image by Gorgo, wikimedia commons.


For the most part, we in the West have measured the consequences of Putin’s folly in Ukraine in terms of damage to his economy, but there are deeper and less obvious consequences that will affect Russia for decades to come.

For starters, Putin grossly overstated his support at home for the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The lack of real democracy in Russia means that Putin can pretend to ignore the unpopularity of his Ukrainian adventure, but even for a skillful, self- promoting dictator, there are limits to his power. I don’t know what those limits are. Unfortunately for Putin, he doesn’t know either. He would not like to discover them, as his increasing ruthlessness could mean that if he is toppled, he could end up with a retirement plan similar to that of his old pal Colonel Gaddafi in Libya.

Another price Russia is paying is that a substantial percentage of its young professionals are immigrating to the West in the wake of Russians allowing Putin to install himself as a modern czar.

That brain drain is hurting Russia. In fact, if so many Russian engineers and scientists had not left their country during the last fifteen years, Russia might not have needed to pay France to build new amphibious assault carriers for them. And now, with the sanctions, Russia doesn’t get the carriers from France. Putin wants desperately to modernize and enlarge his military, but that modernization depends on Russian engineering and scientific capacity, which has has been badly damaged by the intellectual exodus resulting from his repressive policies at home.

Russia is also paying in the form of deteriorating relations with Scandinavian countries.

Last week, Sweden suggested to its partners in the Nordic Defense Cooperation that they do two things. First, that they raise the status of cooperation from the current minimal form by establishing an actual Nordic standing task force to deal with growing aggression from Russia. Second, that deeper military coordination and cooperation be extended beyond Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark to include Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.


Nordic Defense Cooperation Countries Image by S. Solberg J., wikimedia commons.

Nordic Defense Cooperation Countries
Image by S. Solberg J., wikimedia commons.


The bad news for Russia is that it didn’t take more than a few hours for the Nordic members to enthusiastically agree to Sweden’s suggestions. But that’s not all. Sweden has suggested that the combined force that they create should be available to integrate in NATO operations. So in effect, Putin has achieved what Western diplomats could not achieve with half a century of their best efforts–he has managed to get Sweden to join a Western alliance against Russia.

These developments are all consequences of Putin’s adventurism in the Ukraine, and they are all precisely the sorts of developments that Putin was hoping to avoid.

In an alternative scenario, Putin would be capable of seeing beyond 1986.

It is a view that would leave Russia without enemies in Europe. It would be a country where the aspirations of so many of its brightest young people would not include relocation to London or Paris. In that alternative paradigm, Russia could pick up a phone and ask Sweden if it could send a submarine to Swedish waters, and Sweden would say “yes,” because Russia would be a modern nation with a modern foreign policy and friendly relations with its neighbors.

That Russia would experience a better standard of living, greater scientific and cultural achievements, and far better national security. The NATO nations would be happier for it and would enjoy all the advantages of real cooperation between Russia and the West. But that’s the alternative paradigm and a view that Vladimir Putin will not entertain, because such a view would place the interests of the Russian people above his own desire for absolute political power.

The scope of Russia’s lost opportunities is spectacular to behold, but until new leadership arrives, Putin’s dingy Stalinist Cold War reality is all that we can expect for that country and its unfortunate neighbors. Proof that you can take the boy out of the Cold War, but you can’t always take the Cold War out of the boy.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Related Posts

France–At the Crossroads of Russia and NATO

How Putin is Having His Way with the West

Dances with Bears–The Putin/West Waltz

Ukraine in Crisis:  Vladimir Putin and the Power of Gas

Timeline of Ukrainian Turmoil–Part Two, 2001 – Present

It Didn’t Start Last Week–Timeline of Ukrainian Invasions



11 comments on “Russia’s Ukraine Invasion–The Cost

  1. Title couldn’t have stated the whole thing better. It will be interesting to see what develops over the next few years in the region

  2. tucsonmike says:

    All too true. Well I have read other things that say Russia’s birthrate is dropping like a rock. In two generations, possibly, Russians? There used to be Russians… Eurasia is another rough place.

  3. Don Royster says:

    The situation in Ukraine keeps reminding me of the Russian aggression against Georgia. And all this reminds me of the Russo-Finnish War and Russia invasion of Afghanistan. Also Sadam Hussein’s war with Iran. Putin should keep in mind that things don’t always work out according to plan.

    These aggressions toward nearby countries has got to be taking its toll inside Russia and possibly the Russian military’s support for Putin.

    And this aggression could end up uniting the former Soviet states and the Warsaw Pact states against Russia militarily. I could see Georgia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldava, Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Bulgaria, Rumania and the states on Russia’s southern borders uniting in a mutual defense pact. My advice to Putin would be, “Be careful. You may awaken a sleeping giant.”

    If European history teaches anything, it is this. There are lot to be surprised about.

    • Jay Holmes says:

      Hi Don. You are right. Georgia has been wanting to join NATO since the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008. Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Romania are already NATO members. Right now, energy supplies impact the viability of some NATO alliances with ex-Soviet states. There is a major push on to build pipelines and ports capable of handling liquefied petroleum gas in order to cut that energy dependence on Russia.

  4. Holmes, Thanks for this article. Another point worth mentioning is the interest rate investors require in order to buy government-backed bonds or treasury bills. (A bond or T-bill is just a government issued tradeable IOU, with an interest rate attached. Bonds are usually long term, 3-30 years , bills are short term, or less than a year to their IOU date) . The riskier you regard a country as being, the higher the interest rate you demand before you buy their IOUs) Over the last two years the interest rate overseas investors have demanded before buying Russian IOus has gone from about 8 percent to 16 per cent, which is unthinkable among any western European, US, AUS or NZ central banks (except, say Greece.) . Just for comparison, the Australian government currently sells 90 day IOUs at 2.4 per cent interest rate, and 10 year bonds at 2.55 per cent. Germany borrows at close to zero cost. This implies that investors think there is roughly a 7 times greater chance that Russia might not not be able to pay it’s bills, compared to Australia. 7 times might not sound like much , but in international terms, this is a really really big difference. The worse their economic prospects look, the higher this cost will go. I hope Putin gets what he deserves. And I’m glad the two French ships are not going to Russia. Best wishes -RS

  5. Jay Holmes says:

    Hi Richard. You are quite right. Some investment houses consider Russian bonds to be in the “junk” category. Putin has had to reinvest Russian cash reserves to prevent the collapse of Russian currency. It’s hard to predict precisely how Putin’s industrial and financial oligarchs will react or even what they can do about it now that Putin so completely controls the police and the courts along with the military.

Talk to us. We talk back.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.