Special Edition Iran – Timeline Part V

By Jay Holmes

As an intelligence operative, I need a good foundation in history to do my job. After all, if we don’t understand what happened in the past, we can’t understand what is happening today or why. This series outlines Iran’s past as we move toward an analysis of that country’s current nuclear capability and what it means to the West. (See Part IPart IIPart III, and Part IV.)

Today, we look at the ascension of Muhammad Reza Pahlavi, the fellow most Westerners alive today know as “The Shah of Iran.”

The early 1900s represents one of the most critical, most frequently twisted, and most frequently misunderstood or ignored periods in the formation of modern Iran.

First Iranian Majlis, 1906, image from iranian.com

1911 A.D.

The elected Iranian Parliament, the Majlis, appointed a brilliant American lawyer and financier, William Morgan Shuster, to the post of Treasurer General of Iran. The Majlis trusted him because he helped them for several years with his expertise, political connections, and the financial support from his personal wealth as they attempted to form a constitution for Iran. Shuster operated on the belief that a stable Nationalist “pro-Iranian” government in Iran would be better for Iran and for any potential trade partners, including the USA.

Shuster imported a team of American banking experts and white collar crime specialists and began implementing reforms to reduce corruption and build a treasury for Iran. Shuster’s efforts boded well for the future of a constitutional and democratic society in Iran. Naturally, he was unpopular with British oil developers, Russian Czarists, and their Iranian lackeys who grew wealthy from the foreign intervention.

Great Britain used skilled diplomatic pressure on Iran to attempt to oust Shuster. Russia used standard Russian style diplomacy and dispatched an army of 12,000 well-equipped soldiers to invade Iran. The Russians provided muscle for the installation of an obese twelve-year-old named Sultan Ahmed Shah. Russian artillery shelled the Majlis and destroyed it. Democratic Nationalism died an agonizing death across Iran.

In later decades, Iran’s politically ambitious religious fanatics would rail against the filthy Western devils for the invasion, but at the time, many of these fanatics cooperated with the British and the Russians in hopes of destroying democracy in Iran.

Shuster and his Americans departed Iran with their lives intact, due to British maneuvering. Neither the UK nor Russia wanted to drag the US government with its idealistic views into Iran so killing Shuster and his team would have been a political disaster for the UK. The British Foreign Office, with the skilled help of MI-6 and the Royal Navy, and without public disclosures to the voters in the UK, managed to shape the resultant fallout to their advantage, and they gained control of southern Iran and its oil fields.

William Morgan Shuster, image from wikipedia.org

A great opportunity for freedom and democracy in Iran was lost. Shuster later published a book, “The Strangling of Persia.” The book was highly critical of the UK and Russia.

1913 A.D.

Thanks in large part to the UK’s strong grip on Iranian oil reserves, the already pre-eminent Royal Navy was able to take an important technological leap in naval warfare and convert its navy from coal to oil. The advantages were tremendous. They were able to drive still more heavily armored ships at higher speeds, thanks to the efficiency of oil fired boilers vs. coal fired boilers.

The Royal Navy gained more mobility because they required less frequent refueling. For comparison, the US Navy was able to begin the conversion to oil in 1908 with tests on land-based boilers and machinery mock ups. The US committed to the conversion based purely on science rather than economics because she had a reliable domestic supply of oil.

July 28, 1914

Austria made one of the most asinine political decisions in human history. Backed by assurances from the ever confident Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany, Austria invaded Serbia. It seemed like a great decision to the apparently intellectually challenged Austrian royalty and their poorly trained military leaders. It required little capital investment (the first week), and victory should have been quick and profitable. The “easy one month victory” turned in to the great human tragedy known as World War One.

Iran had no idea which way to turn. It made no turns and declared neutrality. It seemed like a great idea and required no capital investment. The neutrality worked about as well as any neutral declaration does when not backed up by military capacity. The Ottomans wanted the oil. The British intended to keep it, and the “neutral” Iran became one more bloody battlefield in the madness of World War One. The Iranian economy was disrupted, agriculture suffered, and children went hungry.

1919 A.D.

Having successfully defended their hold on Afghanistan through World War One, the British government asked itself why it is in Afghanistan. The answer was two fold. One reason was that the British presence in Afghanistan was a response to raids into British controlled India by highly mobile, fast moving Afghan mounted warriors. The second and more critical reason was to simply keep the Russians out.

It occurred to the British Foreign Office that the cruelest thing they could do to the annoyingly communist Soviet Union was to leave them to tangle with Afghanistan. The British withdrew their troops from the profitless Afghan territory and reinforce their border between Afghanistan and India. (If you glance at a map, remember that what is now Pakistan was then part of India.)

Iranian Prime Minister Vosooghoddoleh secretly granted Great Britain direct authority over transportation, financial, and military institutions. Great Britain had stopped paying oil royalties because Iran failed to protect British assets from attack by anti-British gangs and the occasional Soviet agent. The Iranian government was almost completely without authority across Iran.

1920 A.D.

When word of the secret agreement with the British leaked out, rioting erupted in many areas, and anti-government forces started to organize. The incompetent and unpronounceable Prime Minister Vosooghoddoleh was forced to resign and was replaced by an equally powerless but somewhat more pronounceable Prime Minster named Moshiroddoleh.

The government of Iran was weak and disorganized. A fast-riding, fierce tribe from the north (the Soviet communists) invaded northern Iran. They shelled Anzali in northern Iran for three days and then captured the city and set up a camp for the organization of a massive communist revolution in Iran.

The Islamic Iranians were none too impressed with the offers to join an atheist revolution in exchange for free vodka, and the massive revolution failed to materialize. The Iranian government was up to its neck in poverty and internal strife and agreed to surrender its territory north of the Aras river to the USSR. That area is modern day Turkmenistan.

1921 A.D.

An Iranian military leader who distinguished himself in World War One, Reza Khan, seized power with the help of the British. He was able to lead the Iranian Cossack Brigade in suppressing the many local uprisings across Iran.

Reza Khan, image from iranian.com

1922 A.D.

Shia Islamic leader Sheik Abdolkarim Haeri Yadi founded a school for training Shia clerics in Qom. The hitherto insignificant Qom grew into the Iranian center for religion and political discontent.

1923 A.D.

Reza Khan became the Prime Minister of Iran by unanimous election. There were two votes, his and Great Britain’s. If he lacked legitimacy in democratic terms, he was at least intelligent and able to begin to rebuild and modernize Iran.

1925 A.D.

The majority of religious leaders across Iran quietly formed an agreement to support Reza Khan because they strongly opposed democracy. In exchange, Reza Khan agreed to leave religious leaders in charge of many local civil matters. To the Islamic religious leaders, it seemed like a good idea and required no capital investment on their part.

1926 A.D.

Reza Khan ascended the Golden Peacock throne of Persia and was crowned Reza Shah Pahlavi. His eldest son, Muhammad Reza, was declared the crown prince. The shah intensified “Westernization” efforts. The religious leaders started to resent him, but they lacked the power to overthrow him. The Shah ordered the building of Iran’s first cross-country railroad system, new schools, and industrial projects.

1935 A.D.

The Shah now felt strong enough to declare an official name change for the country from Persia to Iran. He began to resist British influence. He outlawed the use of the veil for women, and as his government became more effective, he regained control of local civil matters.

When there was an uprising instigated by angry Shia Islamic leaders at the sacred Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad, Iran, the Shah ordered his military to crush the rebellion. Several hundred protestors were killed.

1941 A.D.

The Shah started to get too cozy with Hitler and Mussolini. The British and Russians moved in and saw that he was deposed. The crown prince, Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi, was placed on the Peacock Throne.

Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi, image from wikipedia.org

In our next article, we will look at Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi’s struggle to remain in power, his relationship with Western powers, and the eventual collapse of the throne of Iran.

Advertisements

14 comments on “Special Edition Iran – Timeline Part V

  1. If nothing else, this series really does show the resilience of the Iranian people. The religious tensions (and the chaos) are part and parcel in their part of the world. They are survivors. They are not about to stop fighting for what they want now.

    • J Holmes says:

      Hi Renee. Yes they have survived and I think you are right about their willingness to fight. The question becomes one of what form that fight will take now. The fight that the ayatollah and his puppet government angst over every day would seem to be disconnected from the interests of the average Iranian.

  2. tomwisk says:

    Didn’t know WWI was fought in Iran. Your overview shows that our “allies” do not always operate in our best interests. It would be naive to believe that the UK would consider the reaction of the US. We need our allies but I believe that in the theater of world politics it’s every man for himself.

  3. J Holmes says:

    Hi tomwisk. I think that to a degree WW1 and WW2 did change that between us and the UK
    Time might erode that but for now we are still fairly close and the UK has made accomodations for us as we have for them.

  4. Hi Holmes.

    It seems the country was formed more by self interest (Iranians and outsiders) than anything else. Sad, given the scholars in the county’s past. I guess their leadership grew as the true value of their natural resources was realized?

    Cheers!

  5. J Holmes says:

    Hi Nigel. You are probably right about resource value being a factor but I’m not sure to what degree. I think leadership and other aspects of human evolution might to a degree evolve interactively across multiple societies to whatever degree communications allow. When democratic rule briefly came to Iran it was at a time when many more Iranians had a broader knowledge of the world beyond the Mideast and knew about democracies in other countries. At the same time their own history, culture, (and resources) had an increasing impact on other nations.

    An idea can remain unborn but once born and known by enough people it can not easily vanish. We all stand on tall shoulders.

  6. Dave says:

    You are on part five of a series on Iran and haven’t even gotten to the date where most Americans became aware that Iran even existed. It gives one a small inkling of just how ancient the history of the region actually is.

    Awesome job, as always…just please don’t issue a test.

  7. J Holmes says:

    Hi Dave. You got an A+ on the test. As someone that once attended a class that I taught let me ask you. Am I not the easiest teacher you ever had?

  8. Dave says:

    Yep, you were a good teacher, which meant that no matter how hard we worked, it was never difficult to work a little bit more.

    • J Holmes says:

      not the answer i expected but thanks. I remember now we did stay late all the time. I’ll have to rethink my teacher image.

  9. […] Edition Iran – Timeline Part I, Timeline Part II, Timeline Part III, Timeline Part IV, and Timeline Part V. Today, Holmes reveals the rise of the Ayatollahs, the attempted US hostage rescue, and the […]

  10. […] are heating up as Holmes dissection of Iran’s past reaches the modern era. Check it out in Timeline Part V & The Rise of the Ayatollahs & the Hostage Rescue […]

  11. […] Edition Iran – Timeline Part I, Timeline Part II, Timeline Part III, Timeline Part IV, Timeline Part V, and The Rise of the Ayatollahs. Today, Holmes takes us behind the intelligence scene as he walks […]

  12. […] Edition Iran – Timeline Part I, Timeline Part II, Timeline Part III, Timeline Part IV, Timeline Part V, The Rise of the Ayatollahs, and Iran Crosses the Nuclear Rubicon. Today, Holmes brings us to the […]

Talk to us. We talk back.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s