Mata Hari, Anna Chapman, and Booty Spies

By HOLMES

It is often claimed that the oldest profession is prostitution. I wasn’t there so I can’t be sure, but if prostitution was the first paid profession, then spying might be a close second. And depending on how it was done, it might also rate a “first profession” claim.

image from wikipedia

While we often think of clandestine activities as being carried out by agile young warriors possessing remarkable minds and near magical martial skills, “spies” and their multiple related “clandestine cousins” have always come in a broad variety of shapes, sizes, and types.

Often times, spies who become known to the public are disappointingly boring in their visible persona. They prefer it that way for obvious reasons. Individuals like Anna Chapman capture attention because they are colorful enough to stir a media consumer’s imagination. I am sure that many male observers’ first impressions of the Anna Chapman Maxim magazine appearance included a notion along the lines of, “Yea, I would have done her.”

Intelligence community members likely tended to see her differently, but we have egos, as well. Male “spooks” might have thought something like, “Hmm, she is a spy, but she never would have fooled me. Politicians are such idiots.”

Female spooks might have thought “Ugh! Another one. . . . Those damned guys are too easy.”

Centuries before Anna Chapman provided the world with a little spy genre entertainment, female spooks were plying the “booty spy” trade. That’s not to say that your average female spook employs sex in her trade craft. The vast majority has no contact with target subjects, and of those who do, very few would resort to sex. If the need arose, they would employ a “specialist” of sorts, and that specialist would not be on anyone’s list of candidates for promotion.

While publicly Anna Chapman is paraded around Russia as a respected professional, she will never get a Rosa Klebb type job or any other important responsibilities in Russia. Her tales of how she wagged her tail will remain her most important asset there.

Rosa Klebb, From Russia with Love

While most of us like to think of booty spies as all being female, there are, in fact, plenty of male equivalents. Some targets are female, and some targets are homosexual males or females, so suitable specialists are available for every imaginable target. If they aren’t, we’ll make one.

Like their female counterparts, I don’t expect any “boy toys” to rise to a position of responsibility in spook world, except, perhaps, as a congressional aide acting as a liaison to the intelligence community, but that would be the choice of the congressman in question. It’s not that people with non-standard sexual preferences or people with over active hormones are excluded from leadership in Spookville, it’s just that sex can’t be their only real talent.

The most famous female spy seductress was a Dutch woman named Margaretha Geertrudia Zelle. Wow. How could anyone with such an ugly name take up a career as a seductress? She must have been talented. She was also smart enough to find a better stage name, which was Mata Hari.

Margaretha Geertrudia Zelle, aka Mata Hari, image from freeinfosociety.com

Margaretha was born in The Netherlands on August 7, 1876. Her farther had been a hatter. He had done well as a hatter and had invested his money in oil at the right time. He was able to indulge his daughter materially, and Margaretha developed a reputation for being as spoiled as a European royal. Unfortunately for Margaretha her father went bankrupt in 1889 when she was 13 years old. Two years later, her mother died. At age 15 she was parceled out to her Godfather. He decided to send her to a school where she would be trained as a teacher so that she would be able to have a career and be independent. It was a reasonable plan. But….

The Headmaster of the school was infatuated with Margaretha, and they apparently had sexual relations. I suppose that at the time, 15-year-old girls were considered eligible for marriage, but even back then, headmasters of schools in the Netherlands were expected to not include hands-on sex education in the curriculum offered to students in their care.

A scandal broke out, and, naturally, rather than delivering a sound beating to the headmaster and sending him for a prolonged swimming lesson in a handy Dutch canal, the school board booted Margaretha out of the school. It must have been quite an education for a teenager far from home, but not the education that her Godfather had anticipated.

Margaretha went to The Hague to live with an uncle. A few years later, she answered a classified ad that sought a suitable female for marriage. The ad turned out to be a hoax. A friend of a 38-year-old Dutch Army officer had placed the ad as a joke, but the joke went further than the friend had perhaps intended. Eighteen-year-old Margaretha became engaged to Rudolph McLeod and they were married on July 11, 1895.

Margaretha and Rudolph McLeod, image from mata-hari.com

The couple traveled to the Dutch East Indies and had two children. While in Indonesia she studied Malaysian culture and trained as a dancer. Rudolph was apparently an alcoholic and a spouse abuser. Not content with his pretty young wife, he kept a concubine. Their son died of poisoning when he was two years old. In 1902, they returned to The Netherlands. They separated soon after their return.

Margaretha decided to start a new life and took a train to Paris. She used her knowledge of Malaysia to create a new entertainment genre based on her version of Malaysian dance style. The dancing involved little clothing, lots of jewelry, and a few supposedly Malaysian phrases. There likely weren’t many Malaysian speakers in Paris at the time and serious dance critics were not her intended audience.

It worked. She was a huge sensation. Margaretha abandoned her burdensome name and took the name “Mata Hari” which apparently means “sun” or “eye of the day” in Malaysia. She claimed to be the daughter of a Malaysian princess and a Dutch baron.

Wealthy and influential European men couldn’t get enough of her. She was kept by multiple lovers (usually senior military officers and politicians) and traveled extensively. One of her lovers was the half-wit German Crown Prince Frederick Augustus. What Freddy lacked in military acumen and political skill, he made up for in cash. He shared lots of it with Mata Hari. She had a good cover if spying was her goal.

Frederick Augustus, image from diadumenian.com

The Netherlands was neutral during World War One so with her Dutch citizenship, Mata Hari was able to travel freely through warring countries. Her contact with senior military officers in France, Germany, and Belgium raised the suspicion of the British Secret Service, and during a trip to England she was arrested and questioned. They released her, and after a vacation in England, she returned to France. I assume that she was under surveillance by MI-5 in England.

Cultural critics in Europe claimed she lacked dancing ability and was nothing more than an exhibitionist. When the Crown Prince of Germany opens his bank accounts to you, who care what the critics say? She had entrée to Europe’s top social circles. She didn’t need the critics. If anything, their scorn might have added to her appeal by making her something of a prized forbidden fruit. She was the sort of woman who wealthy sons might trip over when they are allowed out to play without adequate supervision.

On February 13, 1917, the French arrested Mata Hari and accused her of spying. Unfortunately for Mata Hari and for historians, the investigation and the trial were conducted in secrecy. The French claimed that she had been responsible for the deaths of 50,000 French soldiers by revealing French plans to the Germans. Weather or not she actually spied for anyone has never been determined with anything approaching reasonable certainty. The lack of certainty didn’t stop the French from convicting her. On October 15, 1917, she was executed by a firing squad.

image from mata-hari.com

This we do know:

1) Germany operated a very successful intelligence service during the First World War. They often anticipated allied offensives and were able to move troops, artillery, and supplies to the right place at the right time. Eventually, they and their poorly led Austrian pals ran out of troops and supplies and lost the war.

2) Offensives on the Western Front were difficult to keep secret. Those fascinating new devices called “air planes” and “air planes with big cameras” made it difficult to hide tons of ammunition and supplies being amassed for offensives.

3) No general can easily live with the blame for a failed offensive. Try to imagine being responsible for the deaths of thousands of young men and nearby civilians. It must besomeone’s fault. France had to accept the deaths of 1,400,000 soldiers and watch 4,000,000 maimed French soldiers try to survive with their wounds. Americans can remember the shock, horror and disbelief at the loss of 2,977 people on 9-11. Try to imagine how 1,400,000 dead soldiers might weigh on the minds of French generals. Finding scapegoats would likely be a tempting option.

4) The head of French Counter-Intelligence, Georges Ledoux, was later arrested for being a double agent in the employ of the Germans. He was cleared of all charges. Was he working for the Germans? Would he have given up Mata Hari if she were a valuable spy for Germany? If it was his only viable option for keeping his own skin intact, he might have been willing to give her up. If she were not spying for the Germans, he certainly would have been willing to toss her to the wolves.

5) While in British custody, Mata Hari confessed to Scotland Yard interrogators that she was a French Spy working against the Germans.

6) During her interrogation in France, Mata Hari claimed that she was a double agent working for France against the Germans.

It is possible that Mata Hari was simply whatever she needed to be in the moment to survive. When she confessed to Scotland Yard investigators, she may have been doing what had become a long habit. Given what we know of her life, she probably spent a great deal of time telling people what she thought they wanted to hear.

image from heniford.net

I can only imagine how many times she told some depressed French or German Officer that she didn’t know men were “so large,” or that she had never had a climax before that night. She was likely well-practiced at the art of sweet-talking and was obviously adroit at soothing male egos. The collective weight of her lies might have created a believable, but false, image of a sophisticated spy. It is also possible that she was a spy without any strong loyalty who responded to whatever opportunity presented itself.

The French sealed the files of the Mata Hari case for 100 years. In 1985, they opened the files early, and the information in them left journalists convinced that she was innocent of espionage. Drawing conclusions from the French files is tricky at best. The French files could not possibly contain transcripts of everything that Mata Hari said to German officials during her visits to Germany.

We will likely never know for certain how much effective spying Mata Hari did. Regardless of her actual career or lack of career in espionage, she left us with an enduring archetype of the female spook.

If we were to write an accurate book about “girl spies,” it might not be easy to publish. It would contain far too many examples of boring secretaries, cleaning ladies, nurses, librarians, ministers wives and the like. If nothing else, we owe Mata Hari a little gratitude for spicing up the spy business.

To entertain myself while researching the USS Liberty incident, I have been doing some research on female spies. If interest warrants it, I will produce more articles on the female spies. Researching the USS Liberty is, at times, a depressing task, and studying the Mata Hari case has provided me with some lighter spook tales to de-stress with.

Sorry guys, if I write a series on female spies I will not be including any photos of nude women. I apologize in advance for your disappointment. On the other hand, my editor has an ornery streak that is wider than the Missouri River in spring. You never know with her.

HOLMES

About these ads

16 comments to Mata Hari, Anna Chapman, and Booty Spies

  1. Hi Holmes

    Given her life before she was accused of spying, you’d have to say she was likely to be saying whatever looked most likely to get her out of trouble at that moment. Even if she was a spy, she was probably so used to lying that any information she passed on was dubious at best – which I’m sure her males handlers wouldn’t have worried about.

    Your editor is so ornery, isn’t she?

    Cheers!

    • Jay Holmes says:

      Hi Nigel. I am somewhat “back” now. First of all thank you for your kind help with the blog during my extended absence. You have been been very generous.

      The first ones to be shot should have been the officers that talked too much. They had a higher responsibility to France than any foreign hooker would have had.

      My editor is a little ornery at times which is good. It enables her to tolerate my sense of humor.

  2. Hi, Holmes. I’ve been hibernating in my write-forward-cubby, but had to check in to say you and Piper still rock the blogging world.

    I agree with Nigel. I suspect she would have said whatever she needed to say in order to stay out of trouble at the moment. I try that strategy often. Unfortunately, I’m married to a man who trained at Quantico on interrogation techniques. No. No water-boarding. Just annoyingly specific questions.

    Great post. I have another brain cell occupied by something useful.

    • Jay Holmes says:

      Hi Gloria. Thanks for your visit. I think you are right. In any event the officers should not have been talking so much.

      As for your Quantico certified husband hopefully any interrogations would end in mutually enjoyable “punishment”.

      In our house I never interrogate my wife. Any accounting would leave me on the debit side of things so I’m happy to cruise along without too many questions.

  3. Amazing post. I had no idea and Mata Hari’s story is fascinating. Can’t wait to hear more as you come across much needed distractions. :-)
    I am with Nigel, it’s more likely she was trying to say whatever she needed to get out of trouble but I bet the need for a scape goat far superseded her possible innocence. But…guess we’ll never know for sure.

    • Jay Holmes says:

      Hi Natalie. No French officers were prosecuted so I think she was more a scapegoat than anything else. She might have indeed gotten useful information but the officer that gave it would deserve a more severe punishment than whatever she received.

      In the murderous hell of WW 1 a single life probably seemed insignificant to the French command and the politicians that failed to offer a clemency or reduction in sentence.

  4. Very cool stuff! I always enjoy you guys’ historical pieces so much. I actually dressed as Mata Hari for school one time on Historical Figures Day.

  5. Debra Eve says:

    Utterly fascinating, Holmes. I love your guys’ historical posts, too. I’m familiar with Mata Hari’s story and agree that the jury’s out on her and we’ll never know. I’ve had “Sisterhood of Spies: Women of the OSS” saved on my Amazon wishlist for ages and now I’m itching to get at it.

    Good editing is an art :)

    • Jay Holmes says:

      Hi Debra. The sacrifices made by female OSS agents in WW 2 were remarkable. Those women demonstrated tremendous courage and skill. I am related to one of them.

  6. tomwisk says:

    If an attractive woman approached me with a liason in mind I would become suspicious. I know what I look like and know what I know.

    • Jay Holmes says:

      Hi Tomwisk. Here’s an old spy trick. Don’t wait for one to ask you. Find a safe location not likely populated by booty spies and you do the approaching.

  7. The only fact I knew about her prior to this post was her name. All I can say is Wow. Which is apparently the same effect she had on others.

  8. Jay Holmes says:

    Hi Emily. Given the abuse she suffered and the times she lived in she survived remarkably well until she fell afoul of the French intelligence service.

  9. I had actually done some reading on Mata Hari lately, so it’s cool to see your take on the story. I am also not convinced she was a spy. It is more likely as you suggested, just a girl trying to get by, or a scapegoat.

    She was kind-of a hotty, though. :)

    • Jay Holmes says:

      Hi Laura,

      She may have been a”spy” but she would only have gained whatever information that blabber-mouthed German and/or French officers would have given her in violation of their own governments rules. That being the case they were more guilty than she could have been.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s