Donald Duart Maclean & the Challenge to Soviet Handlers

By Holmes

Donald Duart Maclean was born in London on May 25, 1913. He was the son of distinguished liberal politician, Sir Donald Maclean. Sir Donald was admired and respected in the UK for his attempts to reduce child abuse and his sincere efforts to better the conditions of poor and working class people. Unfortunately, his sincerity did not pass down to his son.

Donald Duart Maclean

Donald Maclean had a comfortable childhood and was sent to boarding schools that were identified with liberal philosophies. He spent five years at Gresham’s School, which had produced several well known socialist and communist writers and philosophers. In 1931, at age 18, he entered Trinity College at Cambridge, where he quickly gravitated toward like-minded youngsters such as Kim Philby, Anthony Blunt, and Guy Burgess.

There is a vast and tiresome mythology surrounding the lives of the infamous Cambridge Forty while they were students. The myths revolve around supposed live witness accounts as to who attended which particular drunken, homosexual/ bisexual/other exotic sexual orgies that the youngsters might have organized in their residences or in their fertile imaginations. Much debate has surrounded the topic of who bedded whom first, second, third etc.

That ugly, four-dimensional sexual jigsaw puzzle has been examined by many in an attempt to help determine who actually recruited whom at what time. I sincerely pity the poor bastards at MI-5 who spent years trying to complete that jigsaw puzzle.

We will likely never get an accurate image of . . . well, let me rephrase this with a more merciful sentence. We will probably never know the precise chronology of events that led to the creation of the espionage “menage a quarante” that resulted from the extracurricular activities of the communistically enamored clique at Cambridge. Certain themes seem to be consistent from the available information, and when one examines the verifiable facts and the many legends, a picture of Anthony Blunt as an early central figure rises from the toxic historical swamp that they left behind.

By the time Maclean arrived at Cambridge in 1931, Blunt was already a graduate assistant and French instructor. My personal best guess is that Blunt was well controlled by the Soviet NKVD before Maclean arrived at Cambridge. In fact, he was likely waiting for Maclean’s arrival, well armed with information about him and plenty of cash with which to party.

In contrast to my personal best guess, Blunt claimed that Guy Burgess had recruited him to the communist cause after Burgess graduated from Cambridge. However, Blunt’s version of the early days of the Cambridge gang seem to be a fabrication that suited whatever his purposes were from day to day.

Anthony Blunt

The fact that Blunt and others changed the details about the pertinent events at Cambridge during their post-exposure decades may indicate that Blunt was mouthing whatever a Soviet controller instructed him to repeat. While changing one’s story can lead to a lack of credibility with some literate segments of the British and Western public, it was a common and trouble-free practice in the Soviet Union.

Until the 1970s, some Soviet controllers and their bosses apparently failed to understand the differences in public reactions between the Soviet Union and the non-captive Western audiences and governments. At times, they clearly played too freely by changing details in cover stories.

One of the reasons why this might have occurred is that they may have been overwhelmed by the complexities of the relationships and the interdependence that they created with their success in recruiting so many interconnected operatives. In the age before practical computers, the task of managing and cross-referencing every important detail of the professional and social lives of so many interconnected, highly active agents was, in itself, a massive undertaking. The number of fake details and clean, reliable alibis that needed to be quickly produced without contradictions doubtless kept a sizable staff in Moscow Central awake for many long nights.

The magnitude of the challenge was multiplied every time the “UK Desk” in Moscow was purged by the USSR. On at least one occasion, the entire Soviet espionage staff in London was recalled to Russia and liquidated. Every one of them. Imagine being a Soviet government employee and stepping over the warm bodies to have to pick up a complicated case like Burgess or Maclean in mid chapter. . . . Vodka anyone? . . . Better yet, how would you like to be the financial auditor reporting to Moscow on the budget projections for these operations?

The Cambridge connection constituted a great well of operatives for the USSR, but when that many buckets are drawn from the same well, one mistake can contaminate all the water. Eventually it did.

After his long party at Cambridge was over, Maclean used his connections to obtain employment in the British Foreign Service. We know for certain from Soviet data that the Soviets fully controlled Maclean before his first day of work as a British government employee. From Soviet documents that were briefly exposed in the post-Soviet era, we also know that Maclean was first handled by a resident of the Soviet embassy operating under diplomatic cover.

After Maclean began producing valuable intelligence concerning the political intentions of Great Britain, the Soviets left him “cold” for a while, and then dispatched a highly skilled and reliable Soviet agent by the name of Kitty Harris. Harris had been born in London and later lived in Canada and the United States. Her travels and her personality made her well suited for deep cover work. Nothing about her except her communist party past in Canada would have caused alarm, and as a currier operating without diplomatic cover, she did not come under the routine scrutiny of MI-5. She simply appeared to be Maclean’s lover, and eventually, she took on that role in reality.

Kitty Harris, image from telefilm.gc.ca

From 1936 to 1938 Maclean produced large volumes of photos and documents from within the British Foreign Office. There was little that the British Foreign Minister knew that Moscow didn’t know the next day. In retrospect, based on the variety and volume of information supplied by Maclean to his controllers, it now seems clear that Maclean was not working alone inside the Foreign Office in London.

In 1938, Maclean was assigned to the British Embassy in Paris. While in Paris, he fell in love with Melinda Marling, the daughter of a wealthy American oilman. In 1940, as the German army was advancing through France, they married and quickly escaped to England.

In the next post, we will look at Maclean’s World War II and Cold War years. Any questions or comments?

About these ads

16 comments to Donald Duart Maclean & the Challenge to Soviet Handlers

  1. Texanne says:

    Another interesting, enlightening, and dismaying post, Holmes. The task of the spymaster must be a lot like the task of the novelist as he struggles to keep all his characters in the right places and to make sure that their stories mesh properly. Do you think they had a war room like the ones we see in movies of the WWII era? Lots of WAACs using croupier’s sticks to push tiny models around a pool table-looking mock up of London, or, in this case, the northern hemisphere.

    And speaking of novelists–which spy writers do the best job of presenting the world of the spook? That brings up another question: do spies read spy novels? Would they, for instance, get ideas from the books? Or would they just sneer and chuckle?

    Thanks for your generous sharing of this knowledge.

    • J H says:

      Hi Texanne. I’m glad that you enjoyed it. I don’t know for sure but I don’t think that the Soviets had rooms similar to “war rooms” where they kept track of operations and operatives with mock ups or maps. Given the necessary use of “cut outs” in the chain of communication, keeping track of precise locations of individual operatives was beyond the technology of the time.

      Individual events might have been rehearsed and planned using table boards and mock ups. For example, the break-in of an office on a military base could be planned this way.

      I am not sure what novelist is best at portraying spook stories in a realistic fashion. I think that novelists will generally abandon many of the constraints of realism in order to make their mystery or adventure book more fun to read. There is a tremendous amount of detail that must be sifted and re-sifted in order for information to become useful to the end users of intelligence, and much of what goes on in espionage is very boring.

      As far as reading tastes, it depends on the individual in question. Overall, I would say that little attention is given to novels by intelligence employees, but that’s just my guess, and I am sure that there are exceptions. The “intelligence community” is huge and it encompasses a vast array of personalities conducting a wide variety of jobs.

      One spy who was well known for reading spy novels and getting ideas from them was an individual by the name of Andrew Dalton Lee. He was “the Snowman” of Falcon and Snowman infamy. He acted as a courier for Christopher Boyce when Boyce was stealing communications codes from the black vault that he worked in at a TRW corporation facility in California. TRW had a contract to operate satellites for the CIA. Lee (the Snowman) would transport the stolen codes to Soviet handlers in Mexico. Lee’s two known hobbies were the sale and consumption of cocaine and other recreational chemicals, and reading spy novels. The Soviet controllers considered Lee a liability and a common criminal and attempted to remove him from the chain of communication.

  2. …and it’s coming your way! I am honoring you with the “Versatile Blogger Award”! Congrats, and thanks for being such an inspiration to me!!!

    http://pauseandsmile.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/and-the-winner-is/

    • J H says:

      Hello Carol. I am glad that you enjoyed the article. I enjoyed your post concerning your daughters educational “crisis”.

      It reminded me of a high school honors student that I know. When he was five his mother (a close friend) called me with anxiety in her voice. The boy’s kindergarten teacher had told her that the boy needed to be moved to “special Ed.” classes because he was not learning fast enough. I had spent enough time with the boy to know that he was brighter than average and learned well. I recommended that the teacher in question be sent to special Ed. classes instead of the boy.

      The boy’s now a young man juggling multiple worthwhile extracurricular activities while doing well in honors classes. Unfortunately, the teacher in question is still a dangerous idiot.

  3. Dave says:

    Thanks for the great post, Holmes… This is very useful information in understanding how someone like this could release an album called “American Pie”. It’s just not right… :-)

  4. J H says:

    Hi Dave. Thanks, I needed a laugh.

  5. [...] In his series on the Unholy Trinity of the Cambridge Forty, Holmes began a post on Thursday about Donald Duart Maclean, the quietest man of the trio. Today, he tells us the rest of the [...]

  6. Lynn Kelley says:

    That’s creepy that the entire Soviet espionage staff was recalled to Russia and liquidated. Not a pretty picture. Not that I feel sorry for them, but that’s pretty gruesome. Anthony Blunt fits his name. I don’t mean blunt as in being outspoken, but what druggies call a huge joint disguised as a cigar. How that fugly dude influenced anyone is beyond me, but that goes to show the power that professors can have over their students.

    I like Texanne’s analogy. As far as spies reading spy novels, you’re probably right. I have a doctor friend who won’t bother to watch House or other programs about doctors because they’re so far fetched.

    As I read these posts, I ask myself why I find all this so interesting. I’m a children’s author. I like light-hearted topics. But then again, I like war movies, too. not that I like war. I just admire war heroes. Okay, on to read more about Maclean…

  7. Interesting. Make-believe becomes a reality. So Burgess is truly Blunt’s lover or is that a fabrication?

    • J H says:

      H Marilag. It has been claimed by members of the Cambridge 40 that Blunt and Maclean were occasionally “play partners”. I guess we would call them “conspirators with benefits”. Maclean denied it at least some of the time.

      I’m not sure that their DNA exchanges indicate much of anything about their espionage work.

  8. [...] Cold War, the Cambridge Forty. Having covered the Unholy Trinity of Kim Philby, Guy Burgess, and Donald Maclean, today he tells us about The Fourth [...]

  9. [...] of the Cambridge Forty. In particular, the Cambridge Five, including Kim Philby, Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, Anthony Blunt, and, today, John [...]

  10. [...] Cambridge Five. Guy Burgess (large picture), Anthony Blunt, Donald Maclean (top), Kim Philby,  John Cairncross [...]

  11. Bill Baker says:

    Interesting material. Melinda Marling was a granddaughter of Blanche Wales Goodlett. Blanche divorced husband Nicholas ca 1902 and after had no contact with her three daughters, including Melinda’s mother Melinda Goodlett.

    Blanche later married Edward Gray Craig, a distant relative on my mother’s side. That marriage didn’t last too long, either.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s